No offer or commitment
This website and PDF deck are prepared for discussion purposes only. They are not an offer, solicitation or commitment to lend, invest or proceed.

Atlas_Redwood_Burlington_Underwriting.xlsx dashboard
85.0% senior LTC base case
Atlas equity, 15.0% of cost
6.2% perm rate, 30-yr amortization
Year-1 NOI divided by loan
10-year hold underwriting

Single-tenant absolute-NNN travel center development underwritten in Atlas_Redwood_Burlington_Underwriting.xlsx for LV Petroleum on the Burlington, Colorado corridor.
Burlington anchors the Eastern Colorado travel-center story on I-70. The workbook frames a single-tenant TA development underwritten for LV Petroleum, with corridor demand, lease economics and senior debt sizing moving through one model.
Loan $29.45M / $31.29M / $33.13M against total project cost of $36.81M.
2.5% fixed annual escalations drive coverage from 1.53x to 1.91x over ten years.
Final model balance of $31.29M with $1.20M of capitalized construction interest.




The model underwrites a 30-year absolute-NNN lease with LV Petroleum, whose FY2025 audit reports $1077.54M of gross revenue.
Total project cost is $36.81M, including $5.00M of land, $24.11M of GC bid hard cost and a $1.20M construction interest reserve.
The 85.0% base-case loan produces 1.53x Year-1 DSCR, an 11.2% debt yield and 62.6% loan-to-stabilized-value at a 7.0% cap.
The 10-year hold model shows 13.5% unlevered IRR, 35.9% levered IRR and an 8.99x levered equity multiple.
What is being asked for, and what secures it.
The active project is the Burlington, Colorado TA travel-center development underwritten for LV Petroleum on a construction-to-permanent basis.
Rates are based on SOFR of 3.65% as of 28 July 2026, with SOFR+400 during construction and SOFR+250 after permanent conversion.
Every case holds the same total project cost, Year-1 NOI, permanent constant and stabilized value.
The 85.0% base case is the active workbook case. The 80.0% and 90.0% cases are calculated from the same workbook total project cost and permanent debt constant.
The asset, the tenant, and who delivers it.
The memo describes a purpose-built TA-branded travel center on the Interstate 70 freight corridor, with the workbook supplying the current budget and sizing.
The active model identifies the project as Atlas Redwood - TA Burlington, CO, a single-tenant NNN travel-center development on the Burlington, Colorado corridor.
Lease economics are modeled around LV Petroleum. The FY2025 audit reports $1.08B of gross revenues, $1.72B of total assets and $223.83M of members' equity.
The workbook carries $24.11M of hard cost from the GC bid, including the c-store/QSR and truck-service components.
The construction tab sizes monthly draws and capitalized interest over a 12-month construction period.
The returns tab shows a 10-year hold, 13.5% unlevered IRR and 35.9% levered IRR.
The memo identifies Burlington on Interstate 70 as the east-west freight corridor between Denver and Kansas City, near the Kansas line.
The underwriting is built around long-haul highway traffic, truck service demand, fueling, foodservice and driver dwell time.
The model treats tenant rent as the core repayment source through a single-tenant absolute-NNN structure.
The memo frames the 15.2-acre site around truck parking, bullpen, fueling canopies, convenience store, Starbucks QSR and truck service uses.
The site address is still a diligence item in the memo; title, survey, entitlement, environmental and geotechnical work remain conditions precedent.
The active workbook uses an absolute-NNN income profile with zero modeled non-reimbursables; the memo notes lease execution as a condition precedent.
Tenant support status: LV Petroleum FY2025 audit facts are retained from the prior extracted audit support; the newest workbook/memo import did not include a readable audit file path.
The Fee Compensation workbook tab discloses cash compensation by recipient, separate from any equity allocations.
General partner interests described in the source materials are equity allocations and are not included as cash project costs in the fee table.
The memo lays out site acquisition, permitting, construction start and certificate of occupancy; the workbook sizes the reserve on a 12-month construction build.
Site closing and loan closing; land, financing fees and tenant representation fee fund at close.
Six-month entitlement and permitting period, with final design and GMP buy-out completed.
Notice to proceed under the GMP contract; draws begin against the schedule of values.
Peak facility utilization; owner's representation engagement runs through the core build period.
Rent commences; the facility converts to permanent debt service and begins amortizing.
$2,287,412 annual debt service against Year-1 NOI of $3,496,937.
The workbook reserve uses the 12-month construction convention; site-control, title, survey, entitlement, environmental and geotechnical diligence remain conditions precedent before any advance.
The budget, the coverage, and how the loan is repaid.
The development budget tab supplies the full sources-and-uses table and a zero balance check.
Sources equal uses with a zero workbook balance check. Sponsor equity is first-loss capital beneath the senior construction loan.
The fee table is embedded in project uses and is disclosed separately from GP equity allocations.
Construction-rate interest accrues monthly and is capitalized into the facility balance.
The active workbook reserve is $1.20M under the MOU convention. The construction tab also flags a $1.55M draw-schedule accrual memo, a $350k variance to be re-sized against the final schedule of values at term sheet.
Year 1 begins at stabilization. Escalations compound while annual debt service is held constant in the model.
Debt yield is calculated on the original $31.29M loan amount. Against the amortizing balance it improves further through the hold.
Each grid holds other workbook inputs constant.
The requested loan is set by the MOU advance rate, so loan-to-cost is the binding sizing test by construction. LTV, DSCR and debt-yield tests provide additional conversion headroom.
The base case does not require a sale for repayment; the exit model is used to frame investor return outcomes.
The facility is sized against Year-1 NOI and permanent debt service, with coverage rising from 1.53x to 1.91x over the hold.
The exit model uses forward NOI of $4.48M, exit value of $61.74M and net sale proceeds of $60.82M before loan payoff.
The 10-year model produces a 35.9% levered IRR, 8.99x levered equity multiple and $44.10M of levered profit.
Every item below is disclosed in the source memo and aligned to the active workbook values.
Diligence materials should be kept under NDA; retained FY2025 tenant audit facts inform the tenant support shown in this deck.
Requested diligence package: executed or draft lease, guaranty form, Burlington site plan, survey, title, environmental, entitlement materials, GC bid support, live workbook and source memo reconciliation.
This website and PDF deck are prepared for discussion purposes only. They are not an offer, solicitation or commitment to lend, invest or proceed.
Atlas_Redwood_Burlington_Underwriting.xlsx controls active Burlington project identity and all model values. The construction-financing memo PDF controls page sequence, hierarchy and non-conflicting narrative. Retained LV Petroleum audit facts remain in this data set from the prior extraction.
Budgets, rents, coverage ratios, valuations, debt sizing and returns are estimates based on the active workbook assumptions. Actual results may differ materially.
The memo PDF body and footer identify Burlington, Colorado / Interstate 70. The cover carries a legacy place typo, so this presentation normalizes the active project location to Burlington, Colorado.
The contents are confidential and furnished solely for evaluation by intended recipients and their advisers.
Recipients should perform their own diligence and consult legal, tax, technical and financial advisers before relying on any underwriting output.
A $36,809,862 TA Burlington, CO travel center - one $31,288,383 senior construction-to-permanent facility at 85.0% LTC, underwritten against LV Petroleum lease economics and 2.5% fixed escalations.